
Back in October 2008 Comcast implemented a controversial amendment to their terms of service for high-speed internet customers by applying a 250gb monthly bandwidth cap which is punishable by a 12 month termination of service.
As this
unlucky customer documents, Comcast has been both ambiguous and underhanded in applying the cap.
First, Comcast seems to have been purposely vague when explaining the cap by conveniently not mentioning the fact that the cap is for both UPLOADS AND DOWNLOADS. That means the cap applies to all of the information you both send and receive.
The way Comcast explained it to me I assumed the cap applied to downloads only. And I know I am not the only one who falsely made that assumption.
Secondly, Comcast's
claim that "less than 1% (currently it’s about one tenth of 1%) of Comcast customers today use an excessive amount of data" seems to be their only justification for the cap. Comcast describes excessive use as using so much data that it negatively effects other customers.
Is Comcast then making the claim that "one tenth of1%" of their customers are using so much bandwidth that it is negatively affecting the other 99.99% of their other customers?
Talk about excessive. Applying a 250gb up and downstream cap is like using a bazooka to protect your children from schoolyard bullies. Sure it gets the job done but the potential for unnecessary and avoidable collateral damage is all but inevitable.
Either these people are using a DISGUSTING amount of bandwidth or Comcast has seriously underestimated and, subsequently, fraudulently advertised the power of their products.
Now I am going to stop beating around the bush. One of the major reasons why Comcast has implemented this cap is to prevent people from file sharing via P2P networks and Bit Torrent clients. I am not sure if they are caving into
pressure from the RIAA, but it sure seems likely to me.
Regardless, Comcast should not limit my PAID access to the internet in any capacity. They should have no interest nor bearing on how I use my internet connection.
Do we hold Smith & Wesson accountable for all the murders committed with their weapons?
As it stands right now, Comcast has a seeming monopoly on high-speed internet connections in my area. I haven't done research on it, but I assume it is the same in other parts of the country as well. I have no other bandwidth comparable, cap-free alternatives right now. So, I am stuck with these crooks.
As soon as
WOW! has internet available in my zip code, you can rest assured I will be dropping Comcast faster than P. Diddy's relevancy.
Something about this whole situation feels very unconstitutional to me.
Oh, and here is some
further reading in case you're interested.
Remember, the internet is an unbelievably powerful tool for expression and the pursuit of freedom. Don't let money-hungry companies like Comcast potentially stand in your way.
Even if you don't use a ludicrously large amount of upload/download streaming, like 250gb a month, just know that a lot of useful, legal technologies are moving/already exist on a predominantly digital format, like NetFlix, iTunes, eMusic, Hulu, PlayStation Network, Xbox Live and so on.
Make a stink now before Comcast really jacks up the price and continues to narrow your monthly allotment of internet.